Marcos believes deals with US, Japan won’t affect China’s investments

Marcos’ belief regarding the impact of deals with the US and Japan on China’s investments likely stems from a combination of geopolitical analysis, economic considerations, and historical context.

Firstly, it’s important to understand the geopolitical dynamics at play. The Philippines, where Marcos holds influence, sits at a strategic crossroads in the Asia-Pacific region. Historically, the Philippines has maintained close ties with the United States, owing to a long-standing military alliance and shared democratic values. Additionally, Japan has been a significant economic partner and investor in the Philippines, contributing to infrastructure development and trade.

In this context, Marcos may view agreements with the US and Japan as reinforcing existing alliances and partnerships rather than directly challenging China’s investments. From a diplomatic standpoint, Marcos may seek to balance relationships with multiple global powers, including China, to ensure stability and economic growth for the Philippines.

Economically, Marcos may believe that increased cooperation with the US and Japan could stimulate investment and development in the Philippines without necessarily detracting from China’s interests. By diversifying foreign investments and partnerships, the Philippines could potentially attract more capital inflows and infrastructure projects, benefiting its economy overall.

Moreover, Marcos’ assertion might reflect an understanding of China’s broader investment strategy. China has been actively expanding its economic influence globally through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which aims to enhance connectivity and trade between China and other regions. While China’s investments in the Philippines and other Southeast Asian countries are significant, they are part of a larger geopolitical and economic strategy rather than solely contingent on bilateral agreements with the US and Japan.

However, it’s essential to consider potential counterarguments and complexities in this analysis. China’s response to agreements between the Philippines and other countries could vary depending on its assessment of its own strategic interests and the perceived implications of such deals. Additionally, economic competition and geopolitical tensions in the Asia-Pacific region could influence China’s investment decisions and diplomatic relations with the Philippines and other neighboring countries.

Overall, Marcos’ belief reflects a nuanced understanding of the geopolitical and economic factors shaping international relations in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly concerning the Philippines’ position and interests vis-à-vis major global powers like the US, Japan, and China.